Commonwealth v. Rambo
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
Appellant Robert D. Rambo was tried by a jury and found guilty of possession with intent to deliver hashish, a Schedule I controlled substance, in violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, Act of April 14, 1972, P.L. 233, § 13, as amended, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30) (1977). Post-trial motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment, and a supplemental motion for a new trial, were denied. Appellant was sentenced to serve one to three years imprisonment and to pay a $1,000 fine and costs of prosecution. The Superior Court affirmed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. TIRPAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. ArmsteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. ShelineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. HansonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. CasuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.