Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rambo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1980No. 204PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellant Robert D. Rambo was tried by a jury and found guilty of possession with intent to deliver hashish, a Schedule I controlled substance, in violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, Act of April 14, 1972, P.L. 233, § 13, as amended, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30) (1977). Post-trial motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment, and a supplemental motion for a new trial, were denied. Appellant was sentenced to serve one to three years imprisonment and to pay a $1,000 fine and costs of prosecution. The Superior Court affirmed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. TIRPAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. ArmsteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. ShelineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. HansonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. CasuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API