Legal Opinion

White v. Jeppson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 24, 2014No. 20120997-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORME, Judge:

11 Plaintiffs Mark and Irene White challenge the district court's judgment in favor of Defendants.1 The district court granted in part the Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings because of Plaintiffs' failure to join indispensable parties. It also granted Defendants' motion targeting Plaintiffs' failure to timely designate an expert witness.2 We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND 3

$2 In 2005, in an effort to learn how to manage money more effectively, Plaintiffs *890enrolled in a financial course offered through a community education program. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Painewebber, Inc. v. Alfred M. Cohen, of the Estate of Samuel GinsburgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Salt Lake County v. Holliday Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reperex Inc. v. Child, Van Wagoner and BradshawCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  2. Duennebeil v. Paramount Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
  3. Baker v. Progressive Direct InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
  4. Brimhall v. Ditech FinancialCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API