Legal Opinion

Hartford v. Stout

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1918No. 14550PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered July 3Í, 1917, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action of replevin, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, John W. Hartford, as plaintiff, brought this action in replevin to recover as his own property an automobile seized by the sheriff under an execution issued upon a judgment in an action in which M. S. Stout was plaintiff and William T. Hartford, father of the respondent, was defendant. Issue was taken on the complaint and a trial had before the court sitting without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the court filed a written memorandum announcing his conclusion upon the evidence and the law applicable thereto, and directed counsel for the defendants, the conclusions…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Junkin v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Wildman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. In re the Estate of CookeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. HambrightWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Sorenson v. Howell, SheriffWyoming Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API