Legal Opinion

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Hambright

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1943No. 28766PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

— Owen Hambright and wife, in the operation of their dry cleaning and laundry business at Soap Lake, had an open account with Farmers Warehouse Company, a corporation. January 12, 1939, the Hambrights executed, as security for payment of a loan of twenty-five hundred dollars from the mortgagee, a chattel mortgage (which was duly placed of record) to Reconstruction Finance Corporation. The chattel mortgage listed certain machinery and equipment, including one Ford panel delivery truck, motor No. 3792778, located on the premises of the mortgagors, and other items of equipment described as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Junkin v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bank of California v. Clear Lake Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Vandin v. Henry McCleary Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hartford v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Straus v. Wilsonian Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Investment & Securities Co. v. RobbinsDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1943
  2. Oliver v. Electrical Products ConsolidatedWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. OLYMPIA STATE BK. & TRUST CO. v. CraftWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Simons v. Lee James Finance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Robert A. Watson v. Wesley K. Duce, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Myrtle M. Dawson, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API