McMahon v. Vickery
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The material-man in this case could have no lien. — Porter v. Toll, 35 Mo. 107 ; Hause v. Thompson, 36 Mo. 450 ; Hause v. Oarroll, 37 Mo. 578; Bridioell v. GlarJc, 39 Mo. 170; Oollins v. Mott, 45 Mo. 102. That the material-man had a lien right, see Oollins v. Mott, 45 Mo. ‘ 100; Koenig v. Mueller, 39 Mo. 165 ; Bridwell v. Ciarle, 39 Mo. 170; Putnam v. Boss, 46 Mo. 337.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.
This is a suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien. The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. From this it appears that the plaintiffs, McMahon & Creighton, did the plumbing work on a building which the defendants King, Yickery & Co. were erecting for the defendant Hartman, who was the owner. The work, amounting to $374.75, was-completed on December 19, 1874. The statement says :
“ During the time in which McMahon & Creighton were doing this work for King, Yickery & Co., King, Yickery & Co. were doing work for them on their leased property, north-west corner Sixth and St. Charles…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Collins v. MottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Kœnig v. MuellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
3Cited by6 opinions
- Masterson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Joplin Supply Co. v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- John O'Brien Boiler Works Co. v. HaydockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Fuller v. RoseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Seidel v. BloeserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.