Seidel v. Bloeser
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court.r-H.ox. Jacob Klein, Judge. The lease in question necessarily conveyed the ground upon which the building stands as appurtenant and incident to the building. Witte v. Quinn, 38 Mo. App. 681; Doyle v. Lord, 64 N. Y. 432; Riddle v. Littleton, 53 N. H. 503; Oliver v, Dickinson, 100 Mass. 114. The improvements in question are more than mere trade fixtures.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court.r-H.ox. Jacob Klein, Judge. The lease in question necessarily conveyed the ground upon which the building stands as appurtenant and incident to the building. Witte v. Quinn, 38 Mo. App. 681; Doyle v. Lord, 64 N. Y. 432; Riddle v. Littleton, 53 N. H. 503; Oliver v, Dickinson, 100 Mass. 114. The improvements in question are more than mere trade fixtures. They are of a permanent nature, and therefore such for which a mechanics’ lien may be claimed. Koenig v. Mueller, 39 Mo. 165; Graves v. Pierce, 53 Mo. 423; Richardson v. Koch, 81 Mo. 264. The statute…
1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.
J. E. and David P. Kaime, on May 11, 1897, were the lessees for and during the natural life of Rebecca Edom, of a three story stone front building, situated on Olive street, been Sixth and Seventh streets, in the city of St, Louis, and known as number 610 Olive street; on that day they made and executed a lease of the first floor and basement of said building to John Bloeser for a term of ten years, should Rebecca Edom live’ so long, reserving a stipulated annual' rental payable in monthly instalments; the lease was for the express purpose of keeping a retail liquor store by John Bloeser,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sheets v. Selden's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Harrington v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1883
- Shawmut National Bank v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Oliver v. DickinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Witte v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McClintic-Marshall Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Snook & Austin Furniture Co. v. Steiner & EmerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Koplo Koplo v. EttengerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Orear v. Dierks Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Holzhausen v. HoskinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.