Kœnig v. Mueller
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Land Court. I. The account sued upon was for work done and materials furnished upon personal property which might have been taken away by the outgoing tenant, and therefore not the subject of a mechanic’s lien — Mech. Lien L. of St. Louis Co., Sess. Acts 1857, p. 668. II.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Land Court. I. The account sued upon was for work done and materials furnished upon personal property which might have been taken away by the outgoing tenant, and therefore not the subject of a mechanic’s lien — Mech. Lien L. of St. Louis Co., Sess. Acts 1857, p. 668. II. Whether personal property, or become fixture by being attached to the freehold, still the demand was not the subject of lien, being for work done and materials furnished by a lessee for the purposes of trade, and therefore not a subject of lien with knowledge of the mechanic or material man. III. The…
1Opinion of the CourtFagg, Judge
This was a suit brought in the St. Louis Land Court, under the provisions of “An act entitled an act for the better security of mechanics and others erecting buildings, or furnishing materials for the same, in themounty of St. Louis.”
The account was for work and labor done and materials furnished in making certain additions and. alterations to property located in the city of St. Louis, of which the said Blakesly was the owner and Franz Oeclislin the lessee. After the performance of the labor and the furnishing of said materials, there was a forfeiture of the lease and a re-letting of the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Armstrong Cork Co. v. Merchants' Refrigerating Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Joplin Supply Co. v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Collins v. MottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- John O'Brien Boiler Works Co. v. HaydockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Evans v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.