Legal Opinion

Aerogroup International, Inc. v. Marlboro Footworks, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 24, 1996No. 96 CIV. 2717 (DLC)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COTE, District Judge:

On April 17, 1996, plaintiff Aerogroup International, Inc. (“Aerogroup”), filed this action alleging violations of several provisions of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1), 1120,1125(a), and 1125(e); the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 271; and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) (“RICO”). Plaintiff also brings various state-law claims. 2 All claims center around alleged violations of plaintiffs intellectual property rights in certain shoes. Defendants Town Shoes Limited (“Town Shoes”) and Gredico Footwear, Ltd. (“Gredi-co”),…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  2. Patricia Chew, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Daren Chew, Deceased and William Chew v. Bent DietrichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of AzerbaijanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  4. Energy Brands Inc. v. Spiritual Brands, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. Edberg v. Neogen Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API