Aerogroup International, Inc. v. Marlboro Footworks, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COTE, District Judge:
On April 17, 1996, plaintiff Aerogroup International, Inc. (“Aerogroup”), filed this action alleging violations of several provisions of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1), 1120,1125(a), and 1125(e); the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 271; and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) (“RICO”). Plaintiff also brings various state-law claims. 2 All claims center around alleged violations of plaintiffs intellectual property rights in certain shoes. Defendants Town Shoes Limited (“Town Shoes”) and Gredico Footwear, Ltd. (“Gredi-co”),…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Patricia Chew, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Daren Chew, Deceased and William Chew v. Bent DietrichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of AzerbaijanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Energy Brands Inc. v. Spiritual Brands, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Edberg v. Neogen Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.