Legal Opinion
Edberg v. Neogen Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 4, 1998No. 3:98CV00717 (GLG)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
This is a patent and trade dress infringement ease, in which the defendant, Neogen Corporation, has filed a motion to dismiss on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). Defendant, a foreign corporation, asserts that the requirements for personal jurisdiction have not been met by virtue of a single sale of its product in the forum state, which was orchestrated by the plaintiff, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. It further asserts that its maintenance of a Web page on the Internet neither satisfies the requirements for personal jurisdiction…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Frank Paterno v. Laser Spine InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- ESAB Group, Inc. v. Centricut, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1999
- Millennium Enterprises, Inc. v. Millennium Music, LPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1999
- Grimaldi v. GuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- ISI Brands, Inc. v. KCC International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.