Legal Opinion

Lundgren v. CITY OF WASILLA

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2009No. S-13108Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A landowner challenged a municipality's delay in replatting and providing an accurate legal description of the land it took using its power of eminent domain, alleging that it unnecessarily interfered with his remainder property rights. As a remedy the landowner requested that the superior court dismiss the previously approved taking without prejudice or, alternatively, change the valuation date for determining just compensation. The superior court denied this motion. Because the superior court did not err in denying the landowner's motion, we affirm its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HammerAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. R & Y, INC. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. SuzukiAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Cissna v. StoutAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API