Legal Opinion

People v. Huerta

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1957No. Crim. 5711PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

The defendant in this matter filed a letter with the clerk of the court indicating that his purpose was to appeal because he had been unjustly convicted. The document will be treated here as though it were an appeal from the judgment.

The appellant was charged in two counts with the sale of narcotics in violation of section 11500 of the Health and Safety Code. After a trial the appellant was found guilty of both counts and sentenced to the state prison, the sentences to run concurrently.

A résumé of the facts is as follows, as to count I: On or about February 13, 1956, Albert Natividad, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. NasworthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. People v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. People v. PuterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. CucciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. People v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. People v. CervantesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. KramerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. People v. RobersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API