People v. Cervantes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON, J.
Iníroduction
Defendant Daniel Duran Cervantes (hereinafter defendant) who requested and was granted permission to represent himself in the trial court appeals from a conviction, following a juiy trial, of rape in violation of Penal Code section 261, subdivision 2.
Defendant’s guilt was established by the testimony of the victim, Catherine G., corroborated in part by her brother and by defendant’s evasive conduct in order to avoid apprehension and trial.
The Facts
Defendant, a casual acquaintance of Catherine G. (age 17 and engaged to be married to a man away in the military…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lizarríbar v. Martínez GelpíSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
- People v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. DoaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.