Legal Opinion

People v. Cervantes

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1978No. Crim. 32056PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON, J.

Iníroduction

Defendant Daniel Duran Cervantes (hereinafter defendant) who requested and was granted permission to represent himself in the trial court appeals from a conviction, following a juiy trial, of rape in violation of Penal Code section 261, subdivision 2.

Defendant’s guilt was established by the testimony of the victim, Catherine G., corroborated in part by her brother and by defendant’s evasive conduct in order to avoid apprehension and trial.

The Facts

Defendant, a casual acquaintance of Catherine G. (age 17 and engaged to be married to a man away in the military…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Lizarríbar v. Martínez GelpíSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
  3. People v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. DoaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API