Legal Opinion

People v. Cuccia

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 2002No. G028341PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, J.

Defendant Stephen Cuccia, Jr., was found guilty of five counts of selling unregistered securities, one count of misrepresenting a security, and one count of attempted grand theft. He contends, among other things, that the trial court improperly forced him to testify out of order and erred by refusing to allow him to testify after the prosecutor was permitted to reopen rebuttal. We agree both incidents resulted in error and, while neither error is per se reversible, we conclude the cumulative effect of the errors violated defendant’s due process right to a fair trial. We…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. RivasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. CapersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. People v. ArdoinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. WaldenColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API