State v. Storkamp
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This appeal stems from an order denying the motion of the surety, Bartsh Bail Bonds' (Bartsh), for reinstatement, discharge, and refund of a $5,000 forfeited bail bond. The bail bond had been forfeited after the defendant, Andrew Storkamp, willfully failed to appear at two scheduled omnibus hearings. The district court, recognizing the good-faith efforts expended by Bartsh in apprehending Storkamp and the lack of prejudice to the state caused by his absence, nonetheless denied the surety’s motion. The court of appeals affirmed, concluding that the district court did not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State v. AmadorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Almor Corp. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. Midland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- State v. McLeodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Miller v. LankowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. AsklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. VangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.