Legal Opinion
State v. Vang
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 31, 2009No. A08-0425PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
On appeal from the district court’s reinstatement and discharge of $500 of a $10,000 bail bond, appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion by failing to hold a hearing and by failing to reinstate the entire amount of the bail bond. We affirm.
FACTS
In October 2006, defendant John Vang was charged with third-degree possession of a controlled substance. In May 2007, appellant Integrity Bonding Company posted a bail bond in the amount of $10,000 to guarantee defendant’s appearance in court. Defendant pleaded guilty to the charges in June 2007 but failed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State v. LiakasNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. StorkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Almor Corp. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State of Minnesota v. Alberto Villa-Barrera, Ability Bonding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Jose C. Garcia Delaharran, Griffin Bail Bonds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009