Legal Opinion

State v. Askland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 2010No. A08-1630PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

784 N.W.2d 60 (2010)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Timothy Clyde ASKLAND, Defendant,

Howe Bonding, Appellant.

No. A08-1630.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 24, 2010.

Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Kristen Nelsen, Mower County Attorney, Jeremy Clinefelter, Assistant County Attorney, Austin, MN, for respondent.

Frank Arend Schulte, St. Paul, MN, for appellant.

OPINION

GILDEA, Justice.

This appeal arises from a district court's denial of Howe Bonding's petition for reinstatement and discharge of a forfeited $10,000 bail bond. At issue is whether the district court erroneously…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. State v. StorkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Almor Corp. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. AshlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Alberto Villa-Barrera, Ability Bonding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State of Minnesota v. Jose C. Garcia Delaharran, Griffin Bail Bonds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State of Minnesota v. Marquis Deonte Gardner, Midwest Bonding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. State v. MulcahyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API