Legal Opinion
Lamont Paige v. Warden, FCI Berlin and (former Religious Services Assistant, Jose Hohmann-Feliciano
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided September 10, 2021No. 18-cv-670-SMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Lamont Paige Case No. 18-cv-670-SM v. Opinion No.
2021 DNH 144
Warden, FCI Berlin and (former Religious Services Assistant, Jose Hohmann-Feliciano O R D E R Lamont Paige, who is an inmate at FCI Berlin and is proceeding pro se, brings claims against FCI Berlin Warden Hazlewood and former Chaplain Feliciano, alleging violations of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”), the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, and the equal protection clause of the Fifth Amendment. 1 Hazlewood and Feliciano move for summary judgment.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Joseph v. Lincare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Gonzalez-Maldonado v. MMM Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Paige v. FCI Berlin, WardenDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021