Legal Opinion

Paige v. FCI Berlin, Warden

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided September 10, 2021No. 1:18-cv-00670Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Lamont Paige Case No. 18-cv-670-SM v. Opinion No.

2021 DNH 144

Warden, FCI Berlin and (former Religious Services Assistant, Jose Hohmann-Feliciano O R D E R Lamont Paige, who is an inmate at FCI Berlin and is proceeding pro se, brings claims against FCI Berlin Warden Hazlewood and former Chaplain Feliciano, alleging violations of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”), the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, and the equal protection clause of the Fifth Amendment.1 Hazlewood and Feliciano move for summary judgment.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Joseph v. Lincare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  5. Gonzalez-Maldonado v. MMM Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API