Legal Opinion

State v. Wahl

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1990No. Crim. 890046PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

David Walter Wahl appealed from an order of the district court which denied his pretrial motion to suppress evidence seized during an undercover narcotics investigation. Wahl claims that the evidence was unlawfully seized and that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

Fargo law enforcement officers and Agent Paul Bazzano of the North Dakota Drug Enforcement Unit were given information by a confidential informant that David Wahl was selling controlled substances, and that the informant would be able to purchase some cocaine from Wahl. The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Leroy ReyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. State v. GreggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. DesperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. State v. HerrickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API