Legal Opinion
Sasmor v. V. Vivaudou, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1951PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This action at law was tried before the court without a jury. Formal findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived by stipulation. I shall undertake to state the facts which I deem essential (Mason v. Lory Dress Co., 277 App. Div. 660; Steel Co. of Southern California v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp., 277 App. Div. 687).
The plaintiff Louis Sasmor and the defendant V. Vivaudou, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Vivaudou) entered into a written agreement, under seal, dated January 22, 1947, whereby Vivaudou employed plaintiff as its director and manager of sales at a fixed salary of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- People Ex Rel. Smith v. PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Boyce v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- Harold N. Holt v. Seversky Electronatom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Bartels v. Rubel Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Kamen Soap Products Co. v. STRUTHERS WELLS CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.