Legal Opinion
Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 13, 2012No. Civ. No. 10-315-SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a patent dispute involving cardiovascular stents. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. (collectively, “BSC”) filed this patent infringement action in the United States District Court for the District of Minneso*262ta against Cordis Corporation (“Cordis”) on December 4, 2009, alleging infringement of claim 36 of U.S. Patent No. 5,922,-021 (“the '021 patent”). (D.I. 1) The District of Minnesota transferred the case to this court in April 2010. (D.I. 46) As discussed in more detail supra,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Masimo Corp. v. Philips Electronic North America Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- Barry v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
- Veracode, Inc. v. Appthority, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
- Ecoservices, LLC v. Certified Aviation Servs., LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018