Legal Opinion

Mosby v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1927No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

In form, this was a proceeding in equity, a taxpayers’ bill against the county commissioners of Allegheny County and Robert G. Woodside, to restrain the former from printing the name of the latter, as a candidate for the office of county controller, on the ballots to be used at the primary election of September 20,1927, and, if he should receive a party nomination at that primary, then on the ballots for the general election to be held November 8, 1927.

Section 2 of the Act of June 27, 1895, P. L. 403, commonly called the “Controllers’ Act,” provides as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DeTurk v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Commonwealth, ex rel. Gast v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. PyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
  4. Inhabitants of Paris v. Inhabitants of HiramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Slater v. VarneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Storb v. SchrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. State Ex Rel. Dostert v. RigglemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Schmeiske v. LaubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API