Legal Opinion
Schmeiske v. Laubin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 30, 1929PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The plaintiff’s intestate was struck by an automobile owned by one of the defendants and operated by the other, and received injuries which resulted in his death. The jury could reasonably have found the following facts, as to which there was little if any dispute: On May 20th, 1928, at about 7.30 p. m. the defendant Clarence Laubin was driving an automobile in a southerly direction upon Bloomfield Avenue in West Hartford, which was at that point a black, oiled macadam road twenty feet wide, with a five foot gravel shoulder on each side. He was driving between fifteen and twenty miles an hour…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fine v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Vinci v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Mezzi v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Russell v. VergasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Baldwin v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Correnti v. CatinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Johnson v. Anoka-Butte Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Lindloff v. DueckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Miles v. ShermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Peterson v. MeehanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.