Legal Opinion

Home Service Casualty Insurance Company v. Barry

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1955No. 3237PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIREY, Justice.

This action (non-jury) is grounded on the collision provisions in a policy of insurance covering a truck. The right rear dual wheels of plaintiff’s truck came off while he was driving it down a slope of a roadway just before reaching a low water concrete bridge without bannisters. When the right rear wheels came off, the right rear end of the truck dropped to the ground and drug on the road and on across the concrete bridge and the truck was seriously damaged. Plaintiff specifically asked for damages, to the truck in the amount of $1,-600 under the collision, provision of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Providence Washington Insurance v. ProffittTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Swanson v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hemel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  5. Peters v. Warren InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1840

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pugh v. Bankers Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Espree v. Western Pioneer Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Sandoval v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
  4. Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance Co. of Iowa v. StansburyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Cobb v. Home & Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API