Sandoval v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.
Natividad Sandoval sought to recover from Hartford Casualty Insurance Company the damages sustained in an upset by his truck which was insured by Hartford. In a bench trial, the court, finding that Sandoval failed to negate Hartford’s pleaded exclusion that the damage was due and confined to a mechanical failure, rendered a take-nothing judgment. Concluding that the evidence negated the pleaded exclusion and that Sandoval’s damages were established, we reverse and render.
Hartford issued its policy insuring a truck owned by Sandoval. While the policy was in force,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Collora v. NavarroTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Cochran v. Wool Growers Central Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of OklahomaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Traylor v. GouldingTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Flack v. First Nat. Bank of DalhartTexas Supreme Court · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arguelles v. Kaplan, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Broady v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Roach v. Roach, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
- Mata v. Mata, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Arguelles v. KaplanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.