Legal Opinion

People v. Mehall

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1995No. Docket 173820PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holbrook, Jr., P.J.

Defendant was charged with two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b(l)(f); MSA 28.788(2)(l)(f). At trial, defendant unsuccessfully moved for a directed verdict of acquittal at the close of the people’s proofs. Defendant then rested without presenting any testimony. Following approximately five hours of deliberation, the jury informed the court that it was deadlocked, and visiting Washtenaw Circuit *356Court Judge Thomas Roumell declared a mistrial on grounds of manifest necessity. Defendant immediately renewed his motion for a directed verdict, but Judge…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. People v. HamptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MehallMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. McEwanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. MehallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API