Legal Opinion

People v. Mehall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1997No. Docket 104412PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Per curiam

After the jury said that it could not reach a unanimous decision in this case, the circuit court declared a mistrial. Later, the court granted the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. The issue is whether double jeopardy principles pre elude another trial. We hold that the defendant may be retried because the actual basis of the directed verdict was not insufficient evidence as required by MCR 6.419(A), and the defendant thus was not “acquitted.”

i

The defendant was charged with two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. At trial, after the prosecution rested its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. People v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. DawsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. People v. GayheartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. SzalmaMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. Ackah-EssienMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. People v. SchultzMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. People v. LettMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API