Legal Opinion

Hines v. Olsen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1920No. 10780PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Mark L. Bozarth, Judge. Injunction by Walker D. Hines, Director General of Railroads, and the St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company against C. H. Olsen and another Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, J

Tbis is an appeal from an order dissolving an injunction and dismissing the petition therefor.

The plaintiffs in error. Walker D. Hines, Director General of Railroads, who was made a party to the suit, and the St. Louis & Sas Francisco Railway Company obtained a temporary order restraining defendants in error from interfering with plaintiffs in error in the construction of what is denominated a spur track across a portion of lot 1, block 4, Rich Hill addition to the town of Henryetta, Oklahoma. Olsen and his wife owned lots 1 and 2 in said block. The Frisco Railway Company owned a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gorman v. CarlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Thomas v. HalsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Shawnee Life Ins. Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Smith v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Varner-Collins Hardware Co. v. New Milford Security Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hines v. BaconSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Chickasaw Lumber Co. v. KunkelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Miller v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Blue Grass Oil Co. v. Central Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Lester v. StreichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API