Legal Opinion

Haynes, Charles v. Williams, Anthony

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 17, 2004No. 03-7134PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.

Concurring opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.

GARLAND, Circuit Judge.

Charles Haynes, a former budget analyst for the District of Columbia, sued the District and its Mayor for allegedly discriminating against him in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants on the ground that Haynes had failed to raise a genuine issue that he was disabled within the meaning of the Act. We affirm.

I

Viewing the evidence in the light most…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Smith v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. Jackson v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. Pardo-Kronemann v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  4. Montgomery v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. Gaujacq v. EDF, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API