Legal Opinion
Pardo-Kronemann v. Donovan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 16, 2010No. 08-5155PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.'
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, an attorney at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, alleges that HUD retaliated against him in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by transferring him to a nonlegal position and by declaring him absent without leave (AWOL) when he failed to report to his new job. After partially denying appellant’s Rule 56(f) motion, the district court granted summary judgment to HUD on both claims. For the reasons set forth in this…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Linda Solomon v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Ahmad Nurriddin v. Charles BoldenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Susan Morris v. Gina McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Camille Grosdidier v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Mary Chambers v. DC (EN BANC)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.