Legal Opinion

United States v. Cudini

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 24, 1992No. ACMR 9200141PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial consisting of officer members. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of three specifications of carnal knowledge, three specifications of sodomy, and one specification of indecent liberties with a child, in violation of Articles 120, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, and 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ], All offenses involved appellant’s step-daughter. Appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 15 years, forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. McCullahUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. GrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. BurdineU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. SealU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. SandersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. Staff Sergeant DANIEL GASKINSArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010
  4. United States v. WhiteArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  5. United States v. JosephU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API