Legal Opinion

Whittle v. Weber

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 2010No. S-13418PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Ora Whittle and Michael Weber are neighbors. Weber filed this lawsuit against Whittle, asserting that Whittle's use of his property is a nuisance, violates subdivision covenants, and violates borough ordinances. As part of discovery, Weber requested an inspection of Whittle's property, and the superior court ordered Whittle to allow a limited inspection. For about two months, Weber and Whittle disagreed on the date Weber would be allowed access onto Whittle's property. Weber then moved to hold Whittle in contempt, and Whittle withdrew his consent to the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ravin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Martinelli v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR CITY, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. Oaksmith v. BrusichAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Jones v. JenningsAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burke v. MakaAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Kollander v. KollanderAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Riddle v. LanserAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Schaub v. SchaubAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API