Legal Opinion
Booker v. C. R. Bard, Inc. (In re Bard IVC Filters Prods. Liab. Litig.)
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided January 29, 2018No. MDL 15–02641–PHX DGC; No. CV–16–00474–PHX–DGCPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
David G. Campbell, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This multidistrict litigation proceeding ("MDL") involves thousands of personal injury cases related to inferior vena cava ("IVC") filters manufactured and marketed by Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (collectively, "Bard"). Plaintiff Sherr-Una Booker, who had a Bard filter implanted ten years ago, brought one of the MDL cases. Plaintiff Booker's case has been selected as one of several bellwether cases and is set for trial in March 2018.
Plaintiffs have filed a motion in limine based on Federal Rules of Evidence 402…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Banks v. ICI Americas, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Doyle v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Stone Man, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kaiser v. Johnson & Johnson & Ethicon, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2018
- Engleman, M. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Dalbotten v. C R Bard IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2023
- ELIZABETH HRYMOC VS. ETHICON, INC. MARY MCGINNIS VS. C.R. BARD, INC. (L-13696-14 AND L-17543-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
- ELIZABETH HRYMOC VS. ETHICON, INC. MARY MCGINNIS VS. C.R. BARD, INC. (L-13696-14 AND L-17543-14, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.