Legal Opinion
Reinert v. Larkin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 28, 2002No. 2:98-cv-05257PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Petitioner Scot Reinert (“Reinert”) brings this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his conviction for first-degree murder. I referred the' petition to United States Magistrate Judge James R. Melin-son for a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) in accordance’ with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Melin-son filed the R & R, recommending that I deny the petition. Reinert filed timely objections. For the reasons set forth below, I will overrule Reinert’s objections, adopt the R & R as…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. NewcombWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Hammonds v. AllenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- Blount v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. Quinn, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County2015
- DUNLAP v. SLAUGHTERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.