Legal Opinion

United States v. Stranack

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 18, 1925No. 389PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNeteker, District Judge

(after stating, the facts as above). Act June 29, 1906, § 15 (section 4374, Comp. St.), authorizes this-proceeding. U. S. v. Ginsberg, 243 U. S. 472, 37 S. Ct. 422, 61 L. Ed. 853. The court, in this ease, at page 474 (37 S. Ct. 425) saidn “An alien who seeks political rights as a-, member of this nation can rightfully obtain-, them only upon terms and conditions specified by Congress. Courts are without authority to sanction changes or modifications.. Their duty is rigidly to enforce the legislative-will in respect of a matter so vital to the-public welfare.”

Again at page 475 (37 S. Ct. 425):…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GinsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. NessSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. RowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Ex parte Mac FockDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. KuscheDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API