Legal Opinion
The Topps Co., Inc. v. Cadbury Stani SAIC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 2, 2005No. 99 Civ. 9437(CSH)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge.
This diversity case is before the Court on the motion of defendant Cadbury Stani S.A.I.C. 1 (“Stani”) for partial summary judgment on the claims and prayed-for damages of plaintiff The Topps Company, Inc. 2 (“Topps”). 3 The rights and obligations of the parties are governed by New York substantive law pursuant to a forum selection clause in the 1980 contract between them. Ebert Aff., Exhibit A, ¶ 31.
I. BACKGROUND
In October 1957, Stani and Topps — at that time, two family owned enterprises — ■ entered into a licensing contract whereby…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lorenzo CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRM COPY CENTERS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Rusyniak v. GensiniDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Sofi Classic S.A. de C.V. v. HurowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Kermanshah v. KermanshahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Petrello v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.