Legal Opinion

Dinardo v. Consumers Power Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1950No. 10969_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

The principal question presented by this appeal is whether the appellant’s acceptance of compensation benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Michigan, Comp.Laws 1948, § 411.1 et seq., precludes him from seeking a recovery in a common law action against appellee, which is alleged to be a third party liable for negligence causing appellant’s injuries.

On May 30, 1945, appellant, a citizen of Ohio, was injured while he was working for an Ohio corporation, an independent contractor, upon the premises of appellee in Michigan. For approximately three years thereafter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michigan Employers Casualty Co. v. DoucetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Brabon v. Gladwin Light & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Overbeek v. NexMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Alexander v. CreelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1944
  5. Fox v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foster v. BucknerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. Graham v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1966
  3. H. R. Kimbrell and Dean Kimbrell, a Minor, by Next Friend and Father, H. R. Kimbrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  4. H. R. Kimbrell and Dean Kimbrell, a Minor, by Next Friend and Father, H. R. Kimbrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API