Legal Opinion

Richard v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 27, 1912No. 746PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal horn Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7250 (T. D. 31785).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise involved in these protests is represented by official exhibits numbered from 1 to 9, both inclusive. It consists of small catgut strings of different gauge or diameter, the first six of which vary in length from 45 to 68 inches and the other three from 23 to 45 inches. They were assessed for duty at 45 per cent ad valorum as strings for musical instruments under paragraph 467 of the tariff act of 1909, the material part whereof is as follows:

467. Musical instruments or parts thereof, * * * strings for musical instruments, not otherwise enumerated in this section * * *.

*307The…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Lorsch & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  2. Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
  3. United States v. BaxterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Manton Cork Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Engelsted v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API