Legal Opinion
Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 19, 1981No. Court 79-3-00423PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MALETZ, Judge.
Plaintiff, a domestic manufacturer of bicycle tires and tubes, challenges a negative countervailing duty determination published by the Secretary of the Treasury on January 8, 1979 involving bicycle tires and tubes from Taiwan. 44 F.R. 1815-16. The determination was rendered under section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1303) as that provision existed prior to January 1, 1980. 1
In substance, the Secretary found that the Taiwanese bicycle tire and tube manufacturers received benefits from the Government of Taiwan under programs providing for (1) a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. National Citizens Committee for BroadcastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Smith Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Associated Industries of New York State, Inc. v. The United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Jesse Douglas v. Robert E. Hampton, Chairman of Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Carlisle Tire and Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Ipsco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Republic Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
- Cheng Shin Rubber Industry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.