State v. Brockob
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — These three appeals have been transferred to this court from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, and consolidated to determine two issues common to all three petitioners. First, whether there was independent evidence sufficient to corroborate the petitioners’ incriminating statements to law enforcement officers under the corpus delicti rule. Second, whether there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions. Each case also presents other unrelated issues.
Fairhurst, J.
¶2 We conclude the independent evidence was insufficient to corroborate Michael Justin Brockob’s incriminating…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AfanaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AfanaWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.