Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Bunker Hill Company

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1965No. 9315PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Claimant Dorothy Bennett, appellant herein, was formerly Dorothy Lunsford, the widow of Leonard Lester Lunsford, deceased. She filed a claim for benefits under the Occupational Disease Compensation Law (Chapter 12, Title 72, I.C.) following the death of her husband, on her own behalf and as the natural guardian of William Leonard Lunsford, a minor child of herself and decedent.

Leonard Lunsford, an employee of The Bunker Hill Company, respondent (herein referred to as the company), died February 10, 1961. The claimant contends that her former husband’s death, which was caused…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Smith v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Beaver v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Kiger v. Idaho CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Walker v. HogueIdaho Supreme Court · 1947

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Madron v. Green Giant CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Dawson v. HartwickIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Alder v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In Re HaynesIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API