Legal Opinion
Larisa Lev-Ary v. Manhattan Fertility Services LLC et al.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 11, 2025No. 1:23-cv-05504Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LARISA LEV-ARY, Plaintiff, 23 Civ. 5504 (DEH) v. MANHATTAN FERTILITY SERVICES LLC OPINION et al., AND ORDER Defendants. DALE E. HO, United States District Judge: In 2014, Plaintiff Larisa Lev-Ary underwent a medical procedure to stimulate growth in her ovaries and have the immature eggs—known as oocytes—extracted and stored. A fertility clinic retrieved eighteen of Ms. Lev-Ary’s oocytes, and most were placed in frozen storage. Seven years later, when Ms. Lev-Ary had her frozen oocytes thawed so they could be fertilized, she discovered…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Kronos, Inc. v. AVX Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kambat v. St. Francis HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.