Legal Opinion

Burg v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 1931No. 6 Div. 725PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The major questions for decision are of venue and jurisdiction of necessary parties in a bill to dissolve a corporation, where accounting is sought of the officers, for collection of unpaid subscriptions to the capital stock, and for appointment of a receiver.

The venue statute contains such expressions as, "be filed in the county in which the defendants, or a material defendant, resides," and "if real estate be the subject-matter of the suit, whether it be the exclusive subject-matter of the suit ornot, then in the county where the same, or a material portionthereof is situated." (Italics…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. ForsythSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Morton & Bliss v. New Orleans & Selma Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Henry v. IdeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Noble v. Gadsden Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  5. Davidson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens Walgreen Drug Agency, Inc. v. Gulf InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Fisher v. Bankers' Fire Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. 48th Street Fairfield Inv. v. Fairfield-Am. Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Rochell v. OatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Cowin v. SalmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API