Legal Opinion

Rochell v. Oates

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1941No. 6 Div. 807PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appeal sought a review of rulings on demurrer.

The amended demurrer to the bill as amended, or grounds thereof, on which the court acted and sustained are numerous. The court did not rest the decree on specific grounds. This has necessitated the due grouping of the same by counsel. This effort to simplify the decision is to be commended. Grounds of demurrer 1 to 7, inclusive, are to the effect that the bill is without equity.

It is declared that the necessity for an accounting by a statutory trustee or fiduciary, whose duty it is to account, “is an implied ground of equity.”

M…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Hall v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Williams v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Dickinson v. National Bank of the RepublicSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Curry v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Southeastern Const. Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Pacific National Fire Insurance Company v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Winston v. WinstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. Doss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. General Beverages, Inc., a Corporation v. K. A. Rogers, Being One and the Same Person as Kenneth A. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API