48th Street Fairfield Inv. v. Fairfield-Am. Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The assignment of errors challenges the action of the trial court in holding the appellants’ plea to jurisdiction insufficient in law, overruling motion to dismiss the bill, and overruling the appellants’ demurrer to the bill.
The hill was for discovery and accounting. First National Bank of LaPine v. Bradley, ante, p. 22, 134 So. 621.
We will not consider on appeal ruling on interlocutory decree overruling the plea of venue or motion to dismiss, same not being within the provisions of the statute, and not final. Section 6079, Code, Acts 1915, p. 137; State v. Jabeles, 203 Ala. 670, 85 So. 16;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Davidson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Campbell v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Adams v. Perryman & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- First Nat. Bank of La Pine v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Wooten v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southeastern Const. Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Goodwyn v. Union Springs Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Taylor v. MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Rochell v. OatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Boothton Coal Mining Co. v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.