Legal Opinion

Tolen v. Tolen

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 30, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The property ordered to be sold in partition consists of a six-room house on a lot twenty-five by one hundred. It belonged to the mother of the complainant and four defendants, and was occupied by their parents. The defendant Sadie Winans and her husband lived with her parents until they died, and then, as she says, she "just stayed on." The master correctly reported that she was not chargeable for the use and occupation, to which exception has been taken.

Mrs. Winans was in sole, but not exclusive, possession. She had the legal right as co-tenant to occupy the house. Cotenants have a several…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. TurnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  2. Barrell v. BarrellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1874
  3. Sailer v. SailerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1886
  4. Edsall v. MerrillNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lohmann v. LohmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Mastbaum v. MastbaumNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  3. Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  4. Brown v. HavensNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Utah Oil Refining Co. v. LeighUtah Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API