Legal Opinion

Edsall v. Merrill

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On final hearing on bill and answer and proofs taken before a master.

1Opinion of the Court

Wan Fleet, Y. C.

This is an action for an account. It is brought by one tenant in common against two others. The complainant holds an undivided fourth, and the defendants three-eighths each, or three-fourths together. The lands held in common consist' of a small tract, containing about five acres, situate in the township of Franklin, in the county of Warren. At the time the parties acquired their respective titles, the lands were supposed to contain a large deposit of mica, and that <a mine could be opened and worked successfully. In April, 1872, within a month after their purchase, the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lohmann v. LohmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Mastbaum v. MastbaumNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  3. Tolen v. TolenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  4. Newman v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API