Legal Opinion

Michael Nadalin v. Automobile Recovery Bureau, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 12, 1999No. 98-2601PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Chief Judge.

This is a class action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq., against a company that repossesses motor vehicles as an agent of creditors who have a security interest. The appeal, which is from the dismissal of the suit for failure to state a claim, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), presents an issue of first impression at the appellate level concerning the provision of the Act regulating repossession, 15 U.S.C. § 1692f(6)(A), although a similar claim has been rejected by another district court. Larranaga v. Mile High Collection & Recovery Bureau,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barry C. Cosgrove, Cross-Appellee v. Joseph Bartolotta and Mary-Bart, Llc, Doing Business as Bartolotta's Lake Park BistroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. The" Sabine"Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Christensen v. HooverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. Chesterfield Sewer & Water, Inc. v. Citizens InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Miles v. International Hotel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cheryl Reynolds v. Beneficial National Bank, Appeals of Belinda PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Lawrence Glazer v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. Rosado v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2004
  4. Gable v. Universal Acceptance Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018
  5. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance v. Reinsurance Results, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API