Legal Opinion
Rosado v. Taylor
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided June 22, 2004No. 3:02-cv-00876PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, Chief Judge.
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-16920, protects debtors from certain debt collection practices. Susanne Rosado filed a complaint charging attorney Septtimous Taylor with violating several provisions of the FDCPA. Mr. Taylor moved for summary judgment, raising both procedural and substantive arguments. In Ms. Rosado’s response, she asked for summary judgment in her favor, though she filed no formal motion. For the reasons stated below, the court grants Mr. Taylor summary judgment in part, denies him summary judgment in…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- William C. Lewis v. Acb Business Services, Inc., (96-3093/3498), American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. James P. Connors, (96-3498)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Lawrence Glazer v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Kaltenbach v. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- University Healthsystem Consortium v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. KmiecikAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.