In re Murphy
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar (board) that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for three years on conditions of probation, including actual suspension for one year. Petitioner was admitted to practice in December 1953 and has no prior record of discipline.
On February 7, 1972, petitioner was convicted, under section 25540 of the Corporations Code, of five counts charging him with offering and selling securities in violation of the conditions of a stock permit issued by the Commissioner of Corporations.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re BogartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- In Re AlkowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1981