Legal Opinion

In re Murphy

California Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1975No. L.A. No. 30456PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar (board) that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for three years on conditions of probation, including actual suspension for one year. Petitioner was admitted to practice in December 1953 and has no prior record of discipline.

On February 7, 1972, petitioner was convicted, under section 25540 of the Corporations Code, of five counts charging him with offering and selling securities in violation of the conditions of a stock permit issued by the Commissioner of Corporations.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re BogartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. In Re AlkowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API